Research Team | BioLife Health Center | Weston Florida
top of page
BioLife Reseach And Development

BioLife Health Center Research and Development

Research Team

The Biolife Health Center Research and Development team are academic professionals working towards a common research goal ensuring research standards are followed. This includes protecting human subjects' rights, safety and welfare, protocol compliance, and adherence to institutional, state and federal regulations and guidance.

David Priede, PhD

David L. Priede

Larrie Hamilton, MIS

Larrie Hamilton

Gabriella Chianese

Gabriella Chianese

Akia Dawson

Akia Dawson

Ashmita Reddy

Ashmita Reddy

Ian Zobrist

Ian Zobrist

Angela Zhang

Angela Zhang

Kelly Skovron

Kelly Skovron

Aditya Trivedi

Aditya Trivedi

Kesha Wu

Kesha Wu

Paisley Zenith, MS

Paisley A. Zenith

Saksha Krishnan

Saksha Krishnan

Sophia Artamendi

Sophia Artamendi

Camille Ylagan

Camille Ylagan

Thinuri Fernando

Thinuri Fernando

Austin Oshima

Austin Oshima

Kashika Bharol, RA

Kashika Bharol

Rishav Kumar

Rishav Kumar

Filina Nurcahya-Tjoa

Filina Nurcahya-Tjoa

Olivia Francis

Olivia Francis

Sujana Nelakanti

Sujana Nelakanti

Research Methodology

BioLife Health Center research involves a systematic process that focuses on being objective and gathering a multitude of information for analysis so that the researcher can come to a conclusion. This process is used in all research and evaluation projects, regardless of the research method (scientific method of inquiry, evaluation research, or action research).

BioLife Scientific Research Methodology

Biolife Health Center Research Methodology Process

 

 

Step 1: Identify the Problem

 

The first step in the process is to identify a problem or develop a research question. The research problem may be something the agency identifies as a problem, some knowledge or information that is needed by the agency, or the desire to identify a recreation trend nationally.

 

Step 2: Review the Literature

 

Now that the problem has been identified, the researcher must learn more about the topic under investigation. To do this, the researcher must review the literature related to the research problem. This step provides foundational knowledge about the problem area. The review of literature also educates the researcher about what studies have been conducted in the past, how these studies were conducted, and the conclusions in the problem area.

 

Step 3: Clarify the Problem

 

Many times the initial problem identified in the first step of the process is too large or broad in scope. In step 3 of the process, the researcher clarifies the problem and narrows the scope of the study. This can only be done after the literature has been reviewed. The knowledge gained through the review of literature guides the researcher in clarifying and narrowing the research project.

 

Step 4: Clearly Define Terms and Concepts

 

Terms and concepts are words or phrases used in the purpose statement of the study or the description of the study. These items need to be specifically defined as they apply to the study. Terms or concepts often have different definitions depending on who is reading the study. To minimize confusion about what the terms and phrases mean, the researcher must specifically define them for the study. In any study, the concept of “individual's health” can be defined in hundreds of ways, such as physical, mental, emotional, or spiritual health.

​Step 5: Define the Population

Research projects can focus on a specific group of people, facilities, employee evaluations, programs, financial status, marketing efforts, or the integration of technology into the operations. The research problem and the purpose of the study assist the researcher in identifying the group to involve in the study. In research terms, the group to involve in the study is always called the population. Defining the population assists the researcher in several ways. First, it narrows the scope of the study from a very large population to one that is manageable. Second, the population identifies the group that the researcher's efforts will be focused on within the study. This helps ensure that the researcher stays on the right path during the study. Finally, by defining the population, the researcher identifies the group that the results will apply to at the conclusion of the study.

 

Step 6: Develop the Instrumentation Plan

 

The plan for the study is referred to as the instrumentation plan. The instrumentation plan serves as the road map for the entire study, specifying who will participate in the study; how, when, and where data will be collected; and the content of the program. This plan is composed of numerous decisions and considerations.

 

Step 7: Collect Data

 

Once the instrumentation plan is completed, the actual study begins with the collection of data. The collection of data is a critical step in providing the information needed to answer the research question. Every study includes the collection of some type of data—whether it is from the literature or from subjects—to answer the research question. Data can be collected in the form of words on a survey, with a questionnaire, through observations, or from the literature.

 

Step 8: Analyze the Data

 

All the time, effort, and resources dedicated to steps 1 through 7 of the research process culminate in this final step. The researcher finally has data to analyze so that the research question can be answered. In the instrumentation plan, the researcher specified how the data will be analyzed. The researcher now analyzes the data according to the plan. The results of this analysis are then reviewed and summarized in a manner directly related to the research questions.

Step 9: Conclusion

 

As you have probably concluded, conducting studies using the eight steps of the research process requires you to dedicate time and effort to the planning process. You cannot conduct a study using a research process when time is limited or the study is done at the last minute. Researchers who do this conduct studies that result in either false conclusions or conclusions that are not of any value to the organization.

bottom of page